Smith v. Aplanalp
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
Questions of fact cannot be tried on a motion for judgment on the pleadings. There was clearly an issue of fact as to the amount of the attorney’s fee. The court was without authority to inquire into the facts while considering a motion for judgment on the pleadings: Oregon & Western Colonization Co. v. Willoughby, 122 Or. 170, 176 (257 Pac. 812); Spencer v. Wolff, 119 Or. 237, 240 (243 Pac. 548); Owen v. Leber, 112 Or. 136, 141 (228 Pac. 927).
The answer pleads facts which constitute fraud. That it does is not really questioned by the plaintiff in his brief as we understand it. Plaintiff says…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hanna v. HopeOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Kreinbring v. MathewsOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Gabel v. ArmstrongOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Spencer v. WolffOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Owen v. LeberOregon Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McDonough v. National Hospital Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Salem Sand & Gravel Company v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Milton v. HareOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Housley v. Linnton Plywood Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Straub v. Oregon Electric Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.