Legal Opinion
Haberl v. Bigelow
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 12, 1993No. 92SC103PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kirshbaum
In Bigelow v. Nottingham, 833 P.2d 764 (Colo.App.1991), the court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment in favor of the respondents, Eugene A. Bigelow and Alyce M. Bigelow (the Bigelows), against the petitioner, Frank J. Haberl (Haberl), on a promissory note executed by Haberl and his wife, Dorothy Haberl. In so doing, the court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s conclusions that Haberl consented to the subordination of a deed of trust to real property executed in connection with the note; that the applicable statute of frauds did not render such consent invalid; and that the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wisconics Engineering, Inc. v. FisherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Capital Investors Co. v. Executors of the Estate of Arthur R. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Denver Brick & Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- A/C Electric Co. v. Aetna InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Beneficial Finance Co. of Norman v. MarshallCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Georg v. Metro Fixtures Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Bryant v. Community Choice Credit UnionColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Villa Sierra Condominium Ass'n v. Field Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Fiscus v. Liberty Mortgage Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Ba Mortg., LLC v. Quail Creek Condominium Ass'n, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.