Legal Opinion

Haberl v. Bigelow

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 12, 1993No. 92SC103Published

1Opinion of the Court

855 P.2d 1368 (1993)

Frank J. HABERL, Petitioner,

v.

Eugene A. BIGELOW and Alyce M. Bigelow, Respondents.

No. 92SC103.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

July 12, 1993.

Leeon E. Hayden, Lakewood, Jacobson & Dudgeon, Ethan A. Jacobson, Lakewood, for petitioner.

Ducker, Dewey & Seawell, P.C., Thomas C. Seawell, Denver, Parcel, Mauro, Hultin & Spaanstra, P.C., Richard P. Barkley, Denver, for respondents.

Justice KIRSHBAUM delivered the Opinion of the Court.

In Bigelow v. Nottingham, 833 P.2d 764 (Colo.App.1991), the court of appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment in favor of the respondents, Eugene…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gebhardt v. GebhardtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Wisconics Engineering, Inc. v. FisherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Capital Investors Co. v. Executors of the Estate of Arthur R. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  4. National Union Fire Insurance v. Denver Brick & Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Haberl v. BigelowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API