Legal Opinion
Meeks v. Papadopulos
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 14, 1980No. Nos. 79-1294, 79-1299 and 79-1308PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
The fundamental issue presented by this cause is the extent to which a member of a police or fire protection agency who works for an employer2 in this state is entitled to overtime compensation under R. C. 4111.03 of the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act. It is argued that the General Assembly did not intend, under R. C. 4111.01(E)(7),3 to exclude all members of police and fire protection agencies from the overtime compensation provisions of R. C. 4111.03. Instead, it is contended that the statute excludes only members of police or fire protection agencies employed on a part time or…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kelley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Carter v. Division of WaterOhio Supreme Court · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Cline v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. MossOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Summerville v. City of Forest ParkOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2001
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.