Legal Opinion

State v. McEnroe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 2014No. 89881-2PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 The State charged Joseph McEnroe and Michele Anderson with aggravated first degree murder and seeks a sentence of death for each of them. In January of this year, roughly five and a half years after *378the State filed its notices of intent to seek the death penalty, the trial court ruled that the absence of “ ‘sufficient mitigating circumstances to merit leniency,’ ” RCW 10.95-.060(4), is an essential element of the crime of capital murder in Washington and, hence, that the State must allege the absence of sufficient mitigating circumstances in the charging information. The trial court…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. Solis-DiazWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. SchiermanWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State Of Washington, V Guadalupe Solis DiazCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. State v. SchiermanWashington Supreme Court · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API