Mississippi State Highway Commission v. West
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcG-ehee, J.
This appeal presents the rather unique and most novel situation of a petitioner in a proceeding in eminent do main finding it necessary to come here for relief against a money judgment of $1,000 rendered as damages in favor of tlie appellees, as lessees of the premises sought to he condemned, where all the proof disclosed that the particular lease had been previously terminated under the written provisions thereof. The question for decision is whether or not the allegations of the petition, as well as the very nature of the proceeding itself, preclude the petitioner from questioning the right…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lieberman v. Chicago & South Side Rapid Transit RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Schreiber v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- In Re Improvement of Third Steeet, St. Paul. Buckbee-Mears Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Skalicky v. Friendship Electric Light & Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railway Co. v. EschnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Clark v. NeeseMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Holmes v. GriffinMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Grand Casino Tunica v. ShindlerMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- McDonald's Corp. v. ROBINSON INDUSTRIESMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Estate of RatliffMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.