Johnson v. Clark
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. Prank G. Pinlayson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
is an. action to enforce specific performance of a contract made by plaintiff with defendant Clark on November 4, 1911, relative to the purchase of certain placer mining property in Humboldt County in this state. The other defendants were made defendants with Clark under allegations in -the complaint that they had acquired an interest from defendant Clark in the contract of purchase subsequent to its execution. The complaint, among other allegations, sets up the contract with Clark hereafter particularly referred to, alleged an assignment by Clark to the other defendants of an interest in…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Warner Bros. Pictures v. BrodelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Steiner v. ThextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Russell v. Golden Rule Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.