Legal Opinion

Burkhart v. Falco

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1934No. Appeal 381PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadteeld, J.,

Plaintiff, holder of a bond and mortgage, dated March 3,1928, entered judgment on February 10,1934, on the bond against defendants, the mortgagors, in the penal sum of $2,400 to secure the payment of $1,200, with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent. The bond is a bond accompanying a mortgage of like amount and date, duly recorded in the Recorder’s Office of Lancaster County, secured upon premises known as No. 546 Beaver Street, Lancaster. Mary Falco, of defendants, is the divorced wife of Antello Falco, the other defendant, and has no further interest in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Williams v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Dobbs v. ZinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Colonial Trust Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Cronin v. Vermont Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beyer v. Lancaster Lodge No. 68 Knights of PythiasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API