Legal Opinion

Beyer v. Lancaster Lodge No. 68 Knights of Pythias

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1935No. Appeal, 197PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

Max P. Beyer, appellant, obtained a rule in the common pleas to show cause why a mortgage in the sum of $1,000, which he had executed in favor of A. H. Hammond, later assigned to the Lancaster Lodge, No. 68 Knights of Pythias, should not be satisfied., The petition alleged that on January 26, 1928, the appellant paid the principal and interest to John N. Hetrick as agent of the lodge. An answer was filed denying that Hetrick bad authority either as agent or trustee to receive tbe principal of said mortgage. Depositions were taken on behalf of tbe appellant, and after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Brientnall v. PetersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Judith v. Dicola Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Burkhart v. FalcoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mosteller v. Burkholder, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API