Legal Opinion

Dobbs v. Zink

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1927No. Appeal, 29PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

Defendants procured from Doctor George H. Mehard two loans of $2,000 and $800 respectively, each of. which they secured by bond and mortgage. The loans were obtained through L. M. Uber, an attorney, residing at the City of New Castle, the county seat of Lawrence County, who had, for many years, been acting as agent for Mehard, a resident of Wampum, nine miles distant from the county seat, in lending money on mortgage security. Interest was paid promptly by defendants to Uber, also payments made to him on account of principal amounting to $1,565. Upon Uber’s death,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. B. & O. Employees' Rel. Ass'n v. PostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Colonial Trust Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Patterson v. VanLoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. American Car & Foundry Co. v. Alexandria Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Vacura v. Haar's Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Healy, Admr. v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
  4. Schauffler v. Highway Truck Drivers & Helpers, Local 107Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. Schauffler v. Highway Truck Drivers & HelpersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API