Renna v. Schadt
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BOWES, J.:
Mark Schadt, M.D. appeals from October 26, 2011 judgment entered on the jury verdict in favor of Carol Renna following denial of post-trial motions in this medical malpractice action. He alleges that the trial court erred under the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Act (“MCARE”), 40 P.S. § 1303.512, in permitting a pathologist and oncologist to render *661expert testimony regarding the standard of care applicable to a surgeon, and in failing to grant a new trial or remittitur for what he views as an excessive verdict. After careful review, we affirm.
Carol Renna,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Gradel v. InouyeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Stark v. Lehigh Foundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Armbruster v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lykes v. YatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Tong-Summerford, A. v. Abington Mem. Hosp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Glover v. Udren Law Offices, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- McFeeley, L. v. Shah, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Price, R. v. Catanzariti, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.