Legal Opinion
PAETEC Communications, Inc. v. MCI Communications Services, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 26, 2010No. Civil Action 09-1639PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs 1 have brought this action against defendants MCI Communications Services, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Business Services and Verizon Global Networks, Inc. (collectively, “Verizon”). Specifically, PAETEC claims that: (1) Verizon failed to pay PAETEC for telecommunications charges under PAETEC’s federal tariffs in violation of federal law, (2) Verizon has failed to pay PAETEC for telecommunications charges under PAETEC’s state tariffs in violation of state law, (3) Verizon was unjustly enriched, and defendants should pay at least (4) quantum meruit. PAETEC…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fireman's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey v. Raymond DufresneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- PAETEC Communications, Inc. v. MCI Communications Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Midcontinent Communications v. MCI Communications Services, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
- Pompa v. St. Luke's HospitalDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023