Legal Opinion
PAETEC Communications, Inc. v. MCI Communications Services, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 9, 2011No. Civil Action 09-1639PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEWART DALZELL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2011, upon consideration of defendants and counterclaim plaintiffs MCI Communications Services, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Business Services and Verizon Global Networks, Inc.’s (collectively, “Verizon”) response to our October 14, 2010 Order to Show Cause (“Verizon Mem.”) (docket entry # 44), plaintiffs and counterclaim defendants’ 1 response to our October 14, 2010 Order (“PAETEC Mem.”) (docket entry #45), Verizon’s motion for leave to file a supplemental declaration (“Verizon Resp.”) (docket entry # 46), PAETEC’s cross-motion for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States Golf Association v. St. Andrews Systems, Data-Max, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- MCI Worldcom, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Nve Inc. v. Department Of Health And Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Mushroom Direct Purchaser Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014