Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Knettle

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 28, 1969No. 1 CA-CIV 768PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

This is an appeal from the court order granting appellees’ motion to quash two writs of garnishment.

On February 24, 1967, James Knettle and Geraldine Knettle, husband and wife, executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700.00 payable to Francis Arnold and Thelma Arnold.

On the reverse side of the note is written the following:

“TO BE PAID IN RETURN FOR BANK NOTE (a) SECURITY BANK MESA IN THE AMOUNT OF 1500+ interest AS PART OF PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT. THIS NOTE'SHALL PAY IN FULL ALL PARTNERSHIP AND OTHER ARRANGEMENTS AS OF FEB. 24, 1967.”

The date of the note arrived and passed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Florida East Coast Railway Company v. RouseSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. Porter v. EyerArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Rau v. RauCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Recor v. Commercial & Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Claudine Hall v. Sylvia GarsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Ruth v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. LeMasterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. City of Tucson v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. State v. JunkinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API