Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Rouse
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
194 So.2d 260 (1966)
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Petitioner,
v.
Ruby ROUSE, Respondent.
No. 34815.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 29, 1966.
On Rehearing January 9, 1967.
Rehearing Denied February 14, 1967.
Bolles, Goodwin & Ryskamp, Miami, for petitioner.
Nichols, Gaither, Beckham, Colson & Spence, and Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for respondent.
2Per curiam
After careful examination of the record and briefs in this case in the light of the argument of counsel, we conclude that no such conflict has been demonstrated as justifies the exercise of jurisdiction by this court.
The petition for…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Henderson v. AntonacciSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Georgia Southern & Florida Ry. Co. v. SEVEN-UP BOTT. CO. SE GEORGIASupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Evans, Et Ux. v. Hillsborough CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Town of Monticello v. FinlaysonSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- State v. McInnesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by98 opinions
- Public Health Trust of Dade Cty. v. ValcinSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- State v. LavazzoliSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Florida Patient's Comp. Fund v. Von StetinaSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Marks v. DelcastilloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Hendeles v. Sanford Auto Auction, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1978
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.