Legal Opinion

Krusemark v. Krusemark

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1951No. 35,222PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

Plaintiff and defendant were married June 20, 1936. Plaintiff commenced this suit for divorce on April 11, 1949, alleging, among other things, that there was no issue of the marriage. On September 8, 1949, a baby girl was born. Defendant interposed a counter suit, also asking for a divorce. By stipulation of the parties, defendant was permitted to prove up her counter suit as if by default, only the issue of alimony and support for the minor child being litigated. The court granted defendant a divorce, awarded custody of the child to her, and ordered plaintiff to pay $40 per…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loth v. LothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Webber v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Fruen v. FruenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Burke v. BurkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Village of Edina v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Ruprecht v. RuprechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Aske v. AskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Propper v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API