Legal Opinion

Baker v. Baker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 6, 1947No. 34,414PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

From a judgment and decree awarding her an absolute divorce from defendant and from the court’s intermediate order denying her motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals on the ground that the court erred in awarding to plaintiff an inadequate share of the property, as well as an insufficient amount as permanent alimony and as support money.

Plaintiff and defendant were married on August 5, 1926, and at the time of the entry of the divorce decree they were of the respective ages of 52 and 51 years. The custody of their only child, a son 19 years old, was awarded to plaintiff.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kaehler v. KaehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Louden v. LoudenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Webber v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Gerard v. GerardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Hartigan v. HartiganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Loth v. LothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Ruprecht v. RuprechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Kucera v. KuceraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API