Legal Opinion

Ettlinger v. Ettlinger

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1941No. Civ. 11701PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Subsequent to the submission of this appeal on the merits, Isaac Lionel Ettlinger, by whom the appeal was taken, died, and on August 28, 1941, on stipulation, the representative of his estate was substituted as party plaintiff and appellant, and it was further stipulated that the rights of the parties did not abate upon the death of the said Isaac Lionel Ettlinger. However, the decedent will be hereinafter referred to as the appellant.

The appeal is from an order granting a nonsuit in a non-jury trial. The complaint bears the caption “Complaint for Declaratory Relief,” and appellant contends…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schley v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Sears Ettlinger v. EttlingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Allen v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Godfrey v. GodfreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Roberts v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Katz v. KarlssonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. City of Okmulgee v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Padgett v. PadgettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API