Legal Opinion

Luikart v. Paine

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1934No. 28843PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is a suit to collect the constitutional double liability of stockholders in the Farmers State Bank of Stapleton. The trial court decreed that the suit was prematurely brought, because the assets of the bank had not been exhausted, and dismissed the cause of action. The receiver appeals.

The Stapleton bank was organized in 1925, when all the capital stock was subscribed and purchased. None of the stock has been held by the bank since organization. At the time of the purchase of the stock, the constitutional stockholders’ double liability was provided as follows:

“Every stockholder in a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. FunkNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. German Savings BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Bodie v. PollockNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Rogers v. SelleckNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Brownell v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Luikart v. HigginsNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Department of Banking v. HedgesNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Department of Banking v. FoeNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Friede v. SproutMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Luikart v. HeelanNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API