Legal Opinion

Lopez v. Kline

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1997No. 17668PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Judge.

1. On appeal, Plaintiff challenges the trial court’s award of summary judgment dismissing her suit alleging breach of an express or implied contract of employment, breach of an express and implied contract to provide neutral references to prospective employers, and that Lawrence Kline and Herbert M. Denish & Associates, Inc. (Defendant), made statements which were defamatory. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL POSTURE

2. Plaintiff was initially employed as a part-time executive assistant by Defendant, a planning and consulting firm in Albuquerque,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hartbarger v. Frank Paxton Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Newberry v. Allied Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Newberry v. Allied Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Kestenbaum v. Pennzoil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Trujillo v. Northern Rio Arriba Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Balmer v. Elan Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  3. Gormley v. Coca-Cola EnterprisesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Wolford v. LasaterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. West v. WASHINGTON TRU SOLUTIONS, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API