Legal Opinion
Wolford v. Lasater
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 16, 1998No. 18788PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s dismissal of her claims and denial of her motion to amend her complaint. Plaintiff sued Defendants for malicious prosecution, false arrest, abuse of process, and negligent supervision. Her motion to amend sought to assert a claim of negligent investigation. These claims arose from Plaintiffs prosecution for forgery and embezzlement of money from her workplace. She raises four issues on appeal: (1) claim preclusion does not bar her state law claims in state court, (2) the statute of limitations does not bar the claim of negligent…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- City of Sunland Park v. MacIasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Moffat v. Branch ex rel. VincoyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Bartlett v. MirabalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.