Elizabeth Blodgett and Richard Tarmey v. County of Santa Cruz, Pat Liberty, Dan Forbus, Chris Matthews, and Gary Patton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants are property owners of adjoining parcels in a rural area of Santa Cruz, California. They have brought suit under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 1986 against appellees, the County of Santa Cruz and four members of its board of supervisors. They allege that appellees engaged in a series of knowing and intentional acts designed to deprive appellants of due process and equal protection of the laws in connection with appellees’ rejection of appellants’ requests for rezoning and minor land divisions. The district court, 553 F.Supp. 1090, granted summary judgment in favor of appellees and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Blodgett v. County of Santa CruzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dr. Charles Milo Connick v. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America & College Retirement Equities FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Van Komen v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1986
- Tyson v. City of SunnyvaleDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
- Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. RG Financial, Ltd. (In Re Powerburst Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1993
- Eisenberg v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.