Legal Opinion
Blodgett v. County of Santa Cruz
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 23, 1981No. C-80-1077 WHOPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ORRICK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Elizabeth Blodgett and Richard Tarmey, are owners of three adjoining properties located in the rural area of the County of Santa Cruz (“the County”) consisting of approximately 71 acres. Defendants Liberty, Forbus, Matthews, and Patton were members of the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors (“the Board”) in 1979 and 1980. 1 The complaint, filed under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986, charges that the Board engaged in a series of knowing and intentional acts which were designed to deprive plaintiffs of due…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dr. Charles Milo Connick v. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America & College Retirement Equities FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Elizabeth Blodgett and Richard Tarmey v. County of Santa Cruz, Pat Liberty, Dan Forbus, Chris Matthews, and Gary PattonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Van Komen v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1986
- Tyson v. City of SunnyvaleDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
- Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. RG Financial, Ltd. (In Re Powerburst Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.