Legal Opinion
Van Komen v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 25, 1986No. CV84-9043-JSL(Gx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LETTS, District Judge.
Defendant Montgomery Ward & Co. (“Ward”) has moved for summary judgment in this wrongful termination suit brought by Plaintiff Jack Van Komen. Having reviewed the materials submitted by the parties, and having heard oral argument of counsel, the Court believes the motion must be GRANTED.
This case is one of four wrongful termination cases decided together by this Court. In all four, summary judgment has been granted for defendant employer based on California law. As this Court said in the first of the four cases, Cox…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Thi-Hawaii, Inc., a Hawaii Corporation v. First Commerce Financial Corporation, a Nevada Corporation, and Ellaric Corporation, a Hawaii CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Cox v. Resilient Flooring Division of Congoleum Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1986
- Blodgett v. County of Santa CruzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
- Elizabeth Blodgett and Richard Tarmey v. County of Santa Cruz, Pat Liberty, Dan Forbus, Chris Matthews, and Gary PattonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sinai Memorial Chapel v. DudlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Lemnitzer v. Philippine Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1992
- Marvin A. McNatt v. Allied-Signal, Inc., Richard A. Graser, and James A. GreensladeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Ruben L. Allman v. Westmoreland Coal Company, Ruben L. Allman v. Westmoreland Coal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990