Legal Opinion

Saudi American Bank v. Azhari

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 11, 1990No. C7-90-868PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant’s original suit against respondents in Hennepin county was dismissed on the grounds of forum non conveniens and was not appealed. Following proceedings in Saudi Arabia, from which respondent Suad Abukhadra was voluntarily dismissed and to which respondent Codeco International was not a party, appellant again brought suit against respondents in Henne-pin county. Respondents’ motion to dismiss on the grounds of res judicata and/or collateral estoppel was granted. Appellant argues that application of collateral estop-pel was improper because the issue was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Mizokami Bros. Of Arizona, Inc. v. Mobay Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re bridgestone/firestoneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  2. Ex Parte Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Green v. City of Coon RapidsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Pope County Board of Commissioners v. PryzmusCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Torres v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API