Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ford Motor Credit Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 2000No. 1990291 and 1990376PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford Motor Credit Company ("FMCC"), Deep South Recovery of Dothan, Inc. ("Deep South"), and Universal Underwriters Life Insurance Company ("Universal"), defendants in an action pending in the Barbour Circuit Court, petition for a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge to dismiss that action. These mandamus petitions present a single question — a question we cannot answer from the materials before us: When a circuit judge, applying the doctrine of forum non conveniens, dismisses a pending action, without prejudice, on the ground that the State of Florida would be a more convenient forum,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Dairyland Ins. Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Equity Resources Management, Inc. v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Mizokami Bros. Of Arizona, Inc. v. Mobay Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Exxon Corporation v. Chick Kam ChooCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Chapman Nursing Home, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Ex Parte EbbersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. In Re bridgestone/firestoneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  4. Greene v. Jefferson County CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Gilbert v. Alta Health & Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API