Legal Opinion
Loughlin v. Loughlin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 12, 2006No. SC 17634PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The plaintiff, Sharon Loughlin, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing in part the judgment of the trial court on the ground that the trial court relied on impermissible factors in crafting its financial orders under General Statutes §§ 46b-81 1 and 46b-82, 2 pursuant to the dissolution of her marriage to the defendant, William Loughlin, Jr. Loughlin v. Loughlin, 93 Conn. App. 618, 889 A.2d 902 (2006). We granted the plaintiffs petition for certification to appeal limited to the following two issues: “(1) Did the Appel late Court properly conclude that the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Vogel v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Foisie v. Worcester Polytechnic Inst.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Weiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Crews v. CrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.