Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Tucker by and Through Edwards

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 6, 1998No. 97SC447PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

We granted certiorari in Tucker v. Gorman, 944 P.2d 653 (Colo.App.1997), to review the court of appeals’ decision reversing the trial court’s determination that a state department can be reimbursed for expenditures it made under the Colorado Medical Assistance Act (CMAA), see §§ 26-4-101 to -904, 8 C.R.S. (1997), only if the defendant is legally liable to the recipient of Medicaid payments.1 In reversing the trial court, the court of appeals held that the comparative negligence statute, see § 13-21-111, 5 C.R.S. (1997), does not bar recovery by the state under the CMAA. We now affirm.

I

In the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. GuentherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Fogg v. MacAlusoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. Ingram v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. M.S. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Brooke v. Restaurant Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Valdez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Brown v. City And County OfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Leonard v. McMorrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  4. City of Colorado Springs v. ConnersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. Mortgage Investments Corp. v. Battle Mountain Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API