Legal Opinion

City of Colorado Springs v. Conners

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 7, 2000No. 98SC137PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

I. INTRODUCTION

In this case, we address the question of whether claims for non-compensatory equitable relief under the Colorado Civil Rights Act (CRA) are claims for “injuries which lie in tort or could lie in tort” for the purposes of the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act (CGIA) and thus whether such claims are either barred by or subject to the notice provisions of the CGIA. Petitioner, the City of Colorado- Springs, appeals a decision by the court of appeals reversing the trial court’s dismissal of a complaint by Kathleen F. Conners, respondent, against the City. See Conners v. City of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Swieckowski Ex Rel. Swieckowski v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. Walton v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. Continental Title Co. v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Colorado State Lottery DivisionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  2. Skyland Metropolitan District v. Mountain West Enterprise, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Elder v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  4. Young v. Brighton School District 27JSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  5. Watson v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API