Legal Opinion
Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Certificate No. TPCLDP217477 v. City of St. Petersburg
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 31, 2003No. Nos. 2D03-1616, 2D03-1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VILLANTI, Judge.
This case presents an issue of first impression in Florida concerning whether an innocent property owner can state a cause of action under the takings clause of either the Florida Constitution or the United States Constitution when the police destroy private property while executing a valid search warrant. The trial court held that neither constitution would support a cause of action for a taking under these facts. While we disagree with some of the trial court’s reasoning, we agree that no cause of action for a taking exists under *1147the facts in this case. Therefore, we affirm.
T…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brutsche v. City of KentWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Brutsche v. City of KentWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Comm. v. William Daws, Jr. and Ouida GershonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Simmons v. LooseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Carolina Convenience Stores, Inc. v. City of SpartanburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.