Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 14, 1949No. 237PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed

Petitioner, engaged in the business of supplying electric energy to the public, seeks the refund of taxes paid by it pursuant to § 3411 of the Internal Revenue Code. That section, in pertinent part, provides for a tax

“. . . upon electrical energy sold for domestic or commercial consumption . . . equivalent to 3 per centum 1 of the price for which so sold, to be paid by the vendor under such rules and regulations as the Commissioner, with the approval of the Secretary, shall prescribe.” 2

Note that the statute taxes energy for domestic or commercial consumption. There is no provision for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. Ewing Von-Allmen Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Michigan Allied Dairy Ass'n v. State Board of Tax AdministrationMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. City of Richmond v. Richmond Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  4. People Ex Rel. Empire State Dairy Co. v. SohmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. United States v. Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rieck-McJunkin Dairy Co. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Ogden Union Railway and Depot Company v. State Tax Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  3. B. L. Cartage Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Allied Chemical Corp v. KowalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. State Tax Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API