City of Louisville v. Ewing Von-Allmen Dairy Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Baird
Reversing.
The sole question involved on this appeal is was the machinery owned and used by appellee in pasteurizing milk in its natural state, subject to municipal assessment and taxation, within the meaning and intent of section 4019a-10, Kentucky Statutes?
The record shows that the machinery of appellee used in the pasteurization process was, by mistake, as appellee alleged in its petition, assessed with the proper officials of the city for $63,862, which is now claimed to be exempt from taxation for municipal purposes.
Appellee in its petition, in addition…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- City of Lexington v. Lexington Leader Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- City of Louisville v. Zinmeister & SonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Rockcastle County v. W. J. Sparks Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hearst Corp. v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Rieck-McJunkin Dairy Co. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Duke Power Company v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Assessors of Boston v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Michigan Allied Dairy Ass'n v. State Board of Tax AdministrationMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.