Legal Opinion

United States v. Public Service Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 19, 1944No. 2855PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, District Judge.

The sole question in this case is whether or not the electrical energy in controversy *80was sold for commercial consumption, as the term is used in the Revenue Act of 1932, 48 Stat. 2S6, Sec. 616, as amended Ch. 96, Sec. 6(a), Act 1933, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 615.1 The applicable portion of said Act is as follows:

• “There is hereby imposed upon electrical energy sold for domestic or commercial consumption and not for resale a tax equivalent to 3 per centum of the price for which so sold, to be paid by the vendor under such rules and regulations as the Commissioner,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Fawcus MacHine Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Coors Porcelain Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. City of Sioux Falls v. ClevelandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Reiser v. MeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Mechanical Farm Equipment Distributors, Inc. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  5. Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API