Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Ray

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 14, 1985No. CX-81-1120PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This attorney disciplinary matter comes to us after a 3-day hearing with the referee’s recommendation that respondent be suspended. We conclude a suspension of 3 years should be imposed.

Respondent Harry N. Ray has practiced law since 1953, the last 9 years as a sole practitioner. He now practices out of his home in Bloomington. In 1981, an attorney representing Walter Dale Hall complained about respondent’s failure to respond to requests for an accounting of funds that had been entrusted by Hall to the respondent for investment. An investigation followed, resulting in this disciplinary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Petition of Disciplinary Action Against DafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. In Re the Discipline of ShawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Matter of Discipline of OkermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Matter of Disbarment of MoberlySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Matter of Disciplinary Action Against QuelloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Matter of Discipline of BealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Larry S. SEVERSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 99363Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against JaegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API