Legal Opinion
Miller v. Bike Athletic Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1998No. 1996-1030PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 80 Ohio St.3d 607.] MILLER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BIKE ATHLETIC COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Miller v. Bike Athletic Co.,
1998-Ohio-178.] Evidence—Focus of trial court in determining whether an expert’s testimony is admissible under Evid.R. 702(C)—Conditions of an accident need not be duplicated in an out-of-court experiment, when. 1. A trial court’s role in determining whether an expert’s testimony is admissible under Evid.R. 702(C) focuses on whether the opinion is based upon scientifically valid principles, not whether the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BostonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. Wegmann, 1-06-98 (2-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Siegel v. Lifecenter Organ Donor NetworkOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. Mills, 2007 Ap 07 0039 (4-15-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. SimmonsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.