Legal Opinion

State v. Wegmann, 1-06-98 (2-19-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2008No. 1-06-98PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Richard M. Wegmann II, appeals the judgment of the Allen County Court of Common Pleas, convicting him of one count of murder with a firearm specification. On appeal, Wegmann asserts that the trial court erred in excluding evidence and testimony of his defense expert's testing; that the trial court erred in permitting prejudicial hearsay testimony; that the trial court erred in excluding relevant circumstantial evidence; that the trial court erred in improperly and prejudicially instructing the jury on accident and foreseeability; that the prosecutor's…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SuffelOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. Dickinson, 11-08-08 (5-4-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. HoldcroftOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. WallaceOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. CarrOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API