Brissenden v. Howlett
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice House
The question presented on this appeal is whether an elected officer’s compensation, fixed on a population basis by a statute enacted prior to the commencement of his term, may be changed by reason of fluctuation in population, despite the constitutional provision which prohibits increasing or diminishing salaries during terms of office.
The petitioners are county superintendents of schools in eight different counties in Illinois. They were all elected for four-year terms commencing the first Monday in August, 1959. On December 2, i960, the last Federal census became effective, and disclosed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth ex rel. Woodring v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Puterbaugh v. WadhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- State ex rel. Maltbie v. WillWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- State Ex Rel. Moss v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- State Ex Rel. MacK v. GuckenbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stiftel v. MalarkeySupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Winokur v. RosewellIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Rock v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1980
- Opinion No. 72-209 (1972) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.