Legal Opinion
Wiseman, Commr. of Rev. v. Gillioz
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided July 6, 1936No. 4-4403PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.
This action was begun by appellees, and appellees state that the following is a brief statement of the facts:
“The city of Fort Smith has for years been in possession of and operating a municipal water plant and system consisting of a pump station on the Poteau River; storage basins located on high tracts of land in the city, into which the Poteau River water was pumped; and a complete distribution system. It became necessary for the city to abandon the pump station on the Poteau River, due solely to the poor quality of the Poteau River water. The storage basins and distribution system were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boyer-Campbell Co. v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Wiseman v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Bradley Supply Co. v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Wiseman v. Madison Cadillac CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Wiseman v. Arkansas Wholesale Grocers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
3Cited by23 opinions
- Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Crane Co. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Wood v. Central Sand & Gravel Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1940
- Tower Plaza Investments, Limited v. DeWittArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Cherokee Brick & Tile Co. v. RedwineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.