Legal Opinion

Wiseman v. Madison Cadillac Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 23, 1935No. 4-4204PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

The appellee brought-this suit in the Pulaski Chancery Court, alleging that the. General Assembly of the State of Arkansas for 1935 enacted a law known as the Arkansas Emergency Retail Sales Tax Law (act 233 of the Acts of 1935); that the act contained certain exemptions, among others, there was exempt from the provisions of the act, in any case where there is already a privilege tax or a license tax imposed, equal to the amount of such already imposed privilege tax or license. The section relied on is § 15, and is as follows:

“ Section 15. Exemptions. There are hereby specifically exempted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Bush v. MartineauSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Brodie v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  5. Fort Smith v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. James v. ToddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. City of Spokane v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Board of Trustees v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Wiseman v. Arkansas Wholesale Grocers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  5. City of Daphne v. City of Spanish FortSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API