Legal Opinion
United States v. Firouz Yamin and Behroz Geramian
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1989No. 88-3481PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:
Two defendants convicted on various counts related to trafficking in counterfeit watches appeal their convictions. One defendant contends that the court’s jury instruction so misstated the law that it was plainly in error, and the other contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction on two counts and (2) the government was required to produce the actual watches sold as the best evidence that the defendants had trafficked in counterfeit goods. Finding these arguments to be without merit, we affirm.
Special Agents of the U.S. Customs…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brody v. GuercioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- United States v. Jose Alvaro GalloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Barbara ChaneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Billy Wayne Anderson, Jerry Dennis Thomas, Michael Lynn Thomas, and Larry Austin ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Diane Sabatino, United States of America v. Joseph SabatinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Angela Faye Onick and Alvin TolliverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.