Legal Opinion

Wolff v. Tomahawk Manufacturing

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 2, 2025No. 3:21-cv-00880Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JAMES B. WOLFF, Case No. 3:21-cv-880-SI Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO v. EXCLUDE PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT WITNESSES TOMAHAWK MANUFACTURING, Defendant. Stephen Healy, LAW OFFICE OF STEPHEN HEALY, 9450 SW Gemini Drive, PMB 79802, Beaverton, OR 97008, and Sean Darshan Healy, LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN HEALY, 1390 N. McDowell Blvd., Suite G, Petaluma, CA 94952. Of Attorneys for Plaintiff James B. Wolff. Steven L. Levitt and Trevor M. Gomberg, LEVITT LLP, 129 Front Street, Mineola, New York 11501; David W. Silke and Eliza…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API