Legal Opinion

Rice v. Litster

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1999No. 24667PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

This appeal arises from a legal malpractice action brought by Roy Rice (Rice) against the Law Offices of William J. Litster, P.A. (Litster). The district court dismissed Rice’s malpractice claim on summary judgment after ruling that his claim was time barred pursuant to section 5-219(4) of the Idaho Code (I.C.). The Court affirms the decision of the district court.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Rice hired Litster to represent him in two separate actions, Cannon Builders, Inc. v. Rice, Case No. 93595 (Ada Dist. Ct.) and Crooks Industries, Inc. v. Rice, Case No. 93407 (Ada…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bonz v. SudweeksIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Smith v. Meridian Joint School District No. 2Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. City of Chubbuck v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Griggs v. NashIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McPheters v. MaileIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Bishop v. OwensIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Soignier v. FletcherIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Jenkins v. Sroufe (In Re Sroufe)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2001
  5. Bishop v. OwensIdaho Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API