Legal Opinion

Barnsdall Refining Corp. v. Welsh

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1936No. File No. 7910PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This action was brought to enjoin the defendant officers from enforcing, or attempting to enforce, against the plaintiffs the provisions of chapter 204, Daws I93'S- Under the provisions of this statute the operation of any store within this state without a license is made unlawful. The license fees to be paid are graduated according to the number of stores to be operated “under the same general management, supervision or ownership.” Upon one store the annual license fee is $1; upon two> or more, but not to exceed ten, $5 for each additional store; and in excess of ten stores, $10 for each…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Stewart Dry Goods Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Sherman v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Spangler v. JacobyIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Independent Community Bankers Ass'n of South Dakota v. State Ex Rel. MeierhenrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Oster v. JorgensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Kornmann v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Mills v. WilderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Griffis v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API