Legal Opinion

Keyes v. Moy Jin Mun

California Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1902No. S.F. No. 2133PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This is an appeal from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor in an action for unlawful detainer brought for failure to comply with a demand to pay rent or surrender the premises, which demand was made after said rent was due.

The complaint alleges facts showing that there was due plaintiff for rent two hundred dollars on April 1, 1899, and that no part thereof has ever been paid, and the court so found. The prayer of the complaint was for a forfeiture of the lease, restitution of the premises, “and the recovery of $600, being treble the rent now due as aforesaid.” In its conclusions of law…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mason v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Estate of De LaveagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Garfinkle v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Mente & Co. v. Fresno Compress & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Roberts v. RedlichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API