Legal Opinion

United States v. Leasehold Interest in 121 Nostrand Avenue

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 26, 1991No. 90 Civ. 1607PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEINSTEIN, District Judge:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. Introduction

II. Procedural Background

III. Facts

A. Household Members

B. Connection of Household to Drug Activity

C. Clara Smith and the Apartment

IV. Law

Public Housing Forfeiture

Preseizure Notice and Hearing Required

Procedures to Obtain Forfeiture

1. Adequate Notice

2. Claimants’ Objection

3. Scope of Preseizure Hearing

Probable Cause to Forfeit

Defenses to Forfeiture

1. Burdens of Proof

2. Innocent Ownership

3. No Unlawful Activity

4. Fifth Amendment

Forfeiture of Other Claimants’ Interests fa

Y. Conclusion

I. INTRODUCTION

The Government seeks…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sinisgallo v. Town of Islip Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  2. United States v. Cannabis Cultivators ClubDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
  3. United States v. Michelle's LoungeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. All Funds on DepositDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991
  5. Irwin v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API