Legal Opinion

Kurth v. Wiarda

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 6, 1999No. 981582-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

¶ 1 This matter is before the court on appellees’ motion to dismiss and on the court’s sua sponte motion for summary disposition. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the appellees’ motion and withdraw the court’s motion.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Following an extensive trial in this matter, a jury returned a verdict awarding damages against the defendant Lonetree Services, Inc. (“Lonetree”). Shortly thereafter but prior to the entry of a judgment on the verdict, Lonetree moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, for a new trial, and for an order amending the verdict. After a hearing on…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Buzas Baseball, Inc. v. Salt Lake Trappers, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Brickyard Homeowners' Ass'n Management Committee v. Gibbons Realty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Swenson Associates Architects, P.C. v. State Ex Rel. Division of Facilities ConstructionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. George W. Jurgens and Margaret M. Jurgens, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Timothy McKasy D/B/A Tonka Marketing and Cbk, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. State v. RawlingsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harris v. IES Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  2. State v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API