Legal Opinion

Keiser v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1938No. Appeal, 58PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This controversy in a workmen’s compensation case arose out of a petition by the employer for the termination of an open agreement for total disability.

Compensation was paid 300 weeks, the maximum period for'partial disability. On January 22, 1936, the employer filed a petition for the termination of the agreement, in which it was alleged that claimant has an earning power as he is able to work. The claimant filed an answer denying these averments. The referee, after hearing, dismissed the petition and made an award based upon a finding that claimant is totally…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Consona v. R. E. Coulborn & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Bausch v. FidlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Henry v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Byerly v. Pawnee C. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Maishock v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Big Horn County v. IlesWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Louisville N. R. Co. v. SteelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Earley v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Leaver v. the Midvale Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Hughes v. H. Kellogg and SonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API