Legal Opinion

Woodward v. Pittsburgh Engineering & Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1928No. Appeal, 46PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The insurance carrier appeals from an award of compensation and ráises the question as to whether the Workmen’s Compensation Board has jurisdiction or authority to make an award for permanent partial disability. The board found that the claimant had sustained a partial disability, permanent in character;: Section 306 of the Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 742, as amended by the Act of June 26, 1919, P. L. 642, the Act of May 20, 1921, P. L. 966, and the Act of April 13, 1927, P. L. 186, is the legal basis for awarding compensation. It provides for three…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Bausch v. FidlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Berskis v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Joseph KRYSZTOFORSKI, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API