Legal Opinion
Barrett v. Suffolk Transportation Services, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 7, 1984No. CV 83-4307, CV 84-0471PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum of Decision and Order
MISHLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs claim that defendants violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. by terminating the employment of the individual plaintiffs (Barrett, Terraciano and Samuels and other similarly situated) as bus drivers when they reached the age of sixty-five. Federal jurisdiction is asserted under 29 U.S.C. § 626(c). Commissioner of Education of the State of New York (“State defendant”) moves to consolidate these two separate actions. Prior to this motion to consolidate, the State defendant had moved…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellee v. First Citizens Bank of Billings, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New Cherokee Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. KDM School Bus Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Grossman v. Suffolk County District Attorney's OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.