Legal Opinion
John Phillip Zannaras, J. P. Robinson, Jr., and U.S. Tungsten Corporation v. Bagdad Copper Corporation, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 25, 1958No. 15640PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.
In this suit, Zannaras, Robinson and U. S. Tungsten Corporation, hereinafter called “Zannaras,” sought an injunction against Bagdad Copper Corporation, hereinafter called “Bagdad,” to prevent the use, in different manner and quantity, of the water of a stream to the detriment of the vested rights of plaintiffs as prior appropriators of the waters. 1 The trial court held the evidence was insufficient to enable the court “to find as a fact that during critical months of the year, even if Bagdad closed its pumping operations, that water would reach the Zannaras…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Arizona Copper Co. v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Brown v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Moe v. HargerIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Arizona Copper Co. v. GillespieArizona Supreme Court · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Markel v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- John Phillip Zannaras, J. P. Robinson, Jr., and U.S. Tungsten Corporation v. Bagdad Corpper Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960